Reply to Crisp
نویسندگان
چکیده
We are grateful for, but unconvinced by, Roger Crisp’s defence of the Priority View against our critique.1 In this reply, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view. 1. In sections I–II of our article, we endorse the following two claims (among others):
منابع مشابه
Author’s Reply to “A Note on the Simulation of Gas Diffusion in Capillaries and Porous Solids”
متن کامل
Transfer from action to perception: The effect of motor-perceptual enrichment
This study investigated the effect of audiovisual integration on action-perception transfer.40 subjects were randomly divided four groups: visual, visual-auditory, control visual and control visual-auditory. Visual groups watched pattern skilled basketball player and other groups in addition to watching pattern skilled basketball player, heard Elbow angular velocity as sonification. In first st...
متن کاملDISTINGUISHABILITY AND COMPLETENESS OF CRISP DETERMINISTIC FUZZY AUTOMATA
In this paper, we introduce and study notions like state-\linebreak distinguishability, input-distinguishability and output completeness of states of a crisp deterministic fuzzy automaton. We show that for each crisp deterministic fuzzy automaton there corresponds a unique (up to isomorphism), equivalent distinguished crisp deterministic fuzzy automaton. Finally, we introduce two axioms related...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011